I record and watch a lot of the Wimbledon Tennis.
I think the ball boys/girls do an excellent job.
"Back in the day" I seem to remember, I think they were trained by an ex-army RSM.
Their movements seem very military, to my mind to an exaggerated degree. They act like automatons on speed, there is no need for all the exaggerated movements.
In the end this was funny, but could have been serious.
In the Tsitsipas/Thiem game last night, Tsitsipas who was serving and was racing across court for a returned ball, slid in the corner and ended up unmoving on the ground. The TV camera zoomed in so viewers could whether he was injured or not. Fortunately he wasn't.
The ball boy, as probably instructed, remained, motionless, as Tsitsipas came sliding towards him.
Then, he stood, arms stretched out, palms open, to indicate he had no tennis balls,
But I think at that moment, serving, was the last thing on Tsitspas's mind.
I'm presently watching Xinyu Wang v Sofia Henin, playing on court 4, live, on BBC i>player.
I can hear the noise of the spectators, the voice of the umpire and the score is on a strap line at the top of the screen.
For me, it's as good as being there, no, it's better, as I get shown different camera angles.
What's missing? Nothing at all.
There's no intrusive commentary by a couple of "over-enthusiastic wannabes a career in broadcasting," trying to get themselves noticed.
So I avoid being bombarded with "useful facts" about the competitors which will be available on the internet should I feel it necessary.
Sheer bliss.
If only this was an option with all sports coverage.