Your claim to be we refuting six claims, one of which was never even mentioned above. It would have been nice if
you had numbered them, but it seems clear you are not interested in clear communication. Basically you either didn't understand me or are deliberately trying to mislead. Nice.
Unlike you, I will directly quote your statements rather than paraphrasing and making things up.
Also, I already said I was giving general information to all readers of the thread about Sunn Hemp (
Crotalaria juncea).
Not just you. If what I wrote doesn't apply to you, or you are not interested inconsidering the point made,
so be it.
Claim 1. (my numbering)
- Claim: Sunn Hemp seed is more expensive than other cover crops:
- Facts: demonstrated false, factually incorrect.
This is the best of your claims. The price of imported Sunn Hemp seed has come down, especially since many other cover crop legumes are not imported. Remember, all I said was "
Imported seed, usually from India, is more expensive than other cover crop seed, but not prohibitively so". Actually, there are lower priced cover crop options, especially when you consider recommended coverage rates, but I agree the price of the seed is not a major determining factor.
Claim 2.
- Claim: Sunn Hemp unlikely to seed in temperate climate
- Fact: Under proper soil conditions and adequate rainfall, Sunn Hemp can reach 8-12 feet in southern regions and 4-6 feet in the northern regions of the US in 9 to 12 weeks. (Whitetail Institute). Although sunn hemp is of tropical origin, it has been cultivated in temperate zones as far north as Washington state. UF(IFAS Extension)
This is where I begin to think you are deliberately trying to mislead. I am writing about the plant reseeding in temperate climes. I was not discussing its ability to be grown as a summer crop. What I wrote was "
Sunn Hemp is unlikely to seed in temperate climates. This will prevent it from becoming a weed but it also means seed must be repurchased each year". How did you miss this that?
Claim 3
- Claim: only of use in fields that can be allowed to not produce while Sunn Hemp is growing.
- Fact: soil renovation, soil building, and crop rotation is most effectively and efficiently accomplished where the activity does not involve harvest, i. e. removing material.
What the...? Don't come back and repeat the same thing I just wrote and act like you're refuting
anything. That's right, when you grow a cover crop, the field is not producing, i.e. no harvest.
I didn't say there was no benefit to growing a non-producing cover crop, but both commercial farmers and sustenance farmers don't always have that option. Once again, remember, I'm was writing about issues for
anyone to
consider when deciding to grow Sunn Hemp. I was not only just speaking about your situation.
Claim 4
- Claim: Beans as a nitrogen fixing crop may be better:
- Fact: Among modern leguminous crops, beans are considered to be poor nitrogen fixers (Hardarson et al., 1993)
I should be angry about this. I never wrote anything about the nitrogen-fixing ability of beans. How did you get this claim?
What I wrote was "
Perhaps one should also weigh the cost-benefit of Sunn Hemp versus growing a nitrogen-fixing crop such as Beans (Phaseolus spp.) or Soy Beans (Glycine max)". This is from the same paragraph as the previous claim.
Again some growers (commercial, sustenance, and otherwise) might prefer to get a crop during the summer growing season, even if less nitrogen is fixed. I fully get that you have an "experimental" field where that is not an issue. So what.
Like I said before (and will probably have to say again), I'm writing about general issues concerning Sunn Hemp. That it doesn't matter to you doesn't make it wrong.
Okay, I'm taking a little break, but later, I'll be happy to discuss the next two "claims".
Actually two parts of the same false claim.