There is an argument going on in our household concerning the roses we have in the front garden.
There's a row of them right at the front, approx. 15cm from the wall. The roses don't touch the wall themselves but their roots may well have grown underneath it by now; they've been there a good 25-30 years. The wall is older, rapidly loosing its pointing and the bricks are coming loose which I put down to its age, weathering and damp penetration but my partner is convinced it is the roses at fault and sees it as an excuse to chop them all down.
Could the roses be contributing to the damage in any way, even a tiny bit, or are they 100% innocent?
Thanks
There's a row of them right at the front, approx. 15cm from the wall. The roses don't touch the wall themselves but their roots may well have grown underneath it by now; they've been there a good 25-30 years. The wall is older, rapidly loosing its pointing and the bricks are coming loose which I put down to its age, weathering and damp penetration but my partner is convinced it is the roses at fault and sees it as an excuse to chop them all down.
Could the roses be contributing to the damage in any way, even a tiny bit, or are they 100% innocent?
Thanks