A customer wanted to eradicate weeds from the patio area and pathway areas in the garden. As a business, we use commercial grade chemicals. This is naturally very high strength. Due to the lawn being situated next to the treatment areas, there was always going to be damage to the lawn.
The customer was warned repeatedly in the original quote, in CAPITAL LETTERS. A warning was given stating the risks to other plants, the lawn, areas that are not being sprayed. The chemicals are absorbed by root networks that span the entire garden. I warned them of the risks that plants will most likely die after treatment due to the size of the garden. The treatment is 100% effective, which is what they asked for.
Now they are being angry, saying we killed all of their plants as well as the lawn. WHAT?!?!
I explained the risks to them and triple checked to make sure they understood the risks, and if they definitely still wanted to proceed. They accepted and wanted to proceed. How is this my fault?
What would you do here? Who is wrong here?
The customer was warned repeatedly in the original quote, in CAPITAL LETTERS. A warning was given stating the risks to other plants, the lawn, areas that are not being sprayed. The chemicals are absorbed by root networks that span the entire garden. I warned them of the risks that plants will most likely die after treatment due to the size of the garden. The treatment is 100% effective, which is what they asked for.
Now they are being angry, saying we killed all of their plants as well as the lawn. WHAT?!?!
I explained the risks to them and triple checked to make sure they understood the risks, and if they definitely still wanted to proceed. They accepted and wanted to proceed. How is this my fault?
What would you do here? Who is wrong here?